solicitors ireland, irish law firm, solicitors dublin
Paul W. Tracey Solicitors Ireland: Judge rules that age restrictions in redress Act are unconstitutional    -    Zlokalizowana w centrum Dublina firma prawna obserwuje nieuczciwe praktyki wobec polskich pracowników przez działajace bezwzględnie firmy ubezpieczeniowe    -    Dublin city-based Law Firm observes new pressures being put on Polish workers by opportunistic insurance companies    -    Second Test Article    -    First Test Article!    -    Woman abused by uncle awarded €460,000    -    Successful conclusion to the Wellington Quay bus defence    -    Residential Tenancies Update    -    Latest News on PIAB    -    
Legal Blog
Talk To Us
Phone Number:
Call on:
Call during:
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for our Email Newsletter
For Email Newsletters you can trust

Latest News on PIAB

Re: ‘Maintenance of fairness between the strong and the weak’ – Law Society welcomes today’s High Court judgment on victims’ right to representation when dealing with PIAB


The Law Society is delighted by today’s judgment which fully vindicates the arguments made to the court by the applicant’s solicitor, Denis Boland, and the Society in this case.


The judgment confirms that legal representation exists for “the maintenance of fairness between the strong and the weak”.  “The lawyer/client relationship exists in the common good”, its says, “to guarantee equality of arms.”


The judgment confirms that failure to comply with PIAB’s procedures “may be fatal to the claimant’s case”.  PIAB’s procedures “…by reason of their complexity, importance and potential consequences are such as to justify, not only access to legal advice, but also such rights to legal representation as have been identified by the applicant in this case.  Nor are such rights rendered irrelevant by the fact that the Board does not conduct hearings.”.


As the judgment says, “legal representation involves conduct as well as advocacy.  It involves employment of skill and judgement in the obtaining of necessary information and instruction.”.


Welcoming the judgment, Law Society Director General, Ken Murphy, said:-


“The judgment shows that PIAB cannot be trusted to act fairly towards accident victims.  Legal representation is necessary to guarantee the rights of victims of accidents against the interests of big business and the insurance industry that PIAB was designed to protect.


The judgment exposes the imbalance and anti-claimant bias of PIAB.  It would be a very foolish claimant who would not use a solicitor in dealing with PIAB.


The judgment is a serious blow to PIAB with its anti-claimant culture.  Whether PIAB has been holed above or below the waterline only time will tell.”


« back to list

Web Design by 2bscene